Home / Paid Media / Paid social
Paid Media
Paid social for demand you have to create
Search only finds people already looking. Social reaches the much larger group who have the problem and have never searched for your category — at a tenth of the cost per impression, and with creative doing nearly all the work.
Overview
On social, the creative is the targeting
A decade ago you built audiences and the platform served them. Now the algorithms find buyers themselves, given a decent signal, and the thing you actually control is what the ad says and shows. That reverses the old priorities: audience construction becomes a light exercise in exclusions and guardrails, while creative volume and message testing become the engagement. It also means paid social fails in a specific, predictable way — an account with three creatives and a well-built audience structure will plateau within a month and no amount of bid work will move it.
What’s included
- Platform selection based on where your buyers actually are, not where budgets usually go
- Creative production and a tested variant queue rather than occasional refreshes
- Conversions API and server-side measurement wired to CRM outcomes
- Audience guardrails: exclusions, customer lists, suppression of open deals
- Retargeting sequenced by what the person actually saw or read
- Incrementality checks, so demand creation is judged on more than platform self-reporting
Part of our Paid Media engagement · from transparent pricing.
Platforms
Where your buyers are, and what each platform is good for
Platform choice follows the product and the buyer, not the media plan template. Something a person can understand in six seconds behaves completely differently from something that needs a diagram, and that single distinction rules several platforms in or out.
Meta
The widest reach and the most mature optimisation. Works for anything visually demonstrable, and for retargeting almost regardless of category.
TikTok
Cheap attention for products that demonstrate well in motion. Punishing for anything that needs explaining, and demands native-feeling creative rather than repurposed ads.
Underpriced for technical and considered purchases, because the audience is self-selected by topic. Requires copy that does not sound like marketing.
X
Niche, volatile, occasionally excellent for developer and finance audiences. Treated as a test rather than a pillar until the data says otherwise.
YouTube
Where a longer explanation can actually land. Measured on branded search lift and assisted pipeline, never on view-through conversions alone.
Pinterest and others
Specific categories only. We will tell you when a platform is in the plan because it fits, and when it would only be there to look thorough.
Most accounts should run one or two of these properly rather than six badly. Spreading a modest budget across every platform guarantees none of them gets enough data to optimise.
Creative
The engine of the whole channel
Because the algorithms handle delivery, creative is where performance is made or lost. That means treating it as a production line with a queue and a testing discipline, not as a quarterly brand exercise.
Volume with intent
Enough variants in rotation that fatigue never dictates results, each one built to test something specific rather than to look different.
Angle before execution
We test the claim, the objection and the audience's own words first. Polish applied to the wrong message is the most expensive thing in the channel.
Native formats
Built for the feed it runs in. A sixteen-by-nine brand film cropped to vertical reads as an advert and gets scrolled past accordingly.
Hooks measured honestly
Three-second retention and hook rate as diagnostics, not as the headline metric. They explain why something failed; they do not prove it succeeded.
Proof over adjectives
Screenshots, real numbers, real customers, actual product. Only claims we can evidence — if it cannot be substantiated, it does not ship.
Winners travel
What wins here becomes the brief for landing pages, organic content and sales collateral. Paid social is the fastest message-testing instrument you own.
Measurement
Not believing the platform's own homework
Every social platform reports generously on itself, counting view-through conversions and long attribution windows that credit it for purchases it merely witnessed. Taking those numbers at face value leads to overspending; rejecting the channel because last-click shows nothing leads to underspending. The way out is measurement that does not come from the platform.
Server-side events
Conversions API and server-side tagging so measurement survives tracking prevention rather than silently decaying each year.
CRM as the scoreboard
Opportunity and closed-won data from your system, reconciled against platform-reported conversions, with the gap shown rather than hidden.
Windows declared
Every number reported with its attribution window stated, and a stricter view alongside it. A result that only exists at a long view-through window is not a result.
Incrementality tests
Geo holdouts or scaled-spend tests where budget allows, because the honest answer to ‘was this incremental’ is an experiment, not a dashboard.
Branded search lift
Real demand creation shows up as more people searching your name. It is the cleanest external check available and it costs nothing to watch.
Known unknowns labelled
Where measurement genuinely cannot resolve something, the report says so. We will not invent a confident attribution story to fill a gap.
The work
What a paid social engagement actually contains
Fixed monthly fee, published pricing, and this is what sits behind it.
Creative capacity is the constraint that decides whether this channel works. If it is thin on your side, we will scope producing it rather than pretend bid management will compensate.
Honest limits
When paid social will not fix it
This channel rewards products that can be understood quickly and punishes those that cannot. It is also the channel most often bought as a substitute for a positioning decision nobody wanted to make.
Products needing a diagram
If the value takes two minutes to explain, feed placements are the wrong room. Search capture and content serve those buyers better.
Tiny addressable markets
A few hundred target accounts cannot absorb social's reach model. Account-based targeting on LinkedIn is the fit.
No creative capacity
Without a steady supply of new creative, every account here plateaus within weeks. This is a production constraint, not a media one.
Unclear positioning
Ads expose a vague proposition faster and more expensively than any other medium. Fix the message first; it is cheaper.
Thin margins on low prices
When a sale cannot absorb the blended cost of reaching a stranger several times, the unit economics decide the answer, not the targeting.
Regulated claims
Some categories cannot say the thing that would actually persuade. Worth establishing before building a campaign around a claim that will be rejected.
More Paid Media
The rest of the paid programme
Paid media overview
How the channels fit together and which ones your model actually needs.
Google Ads
Capturing demand that already exists, measured against CRM stages.
LinkedIn Ads
Account-based targeting when search volume is too thin to optimise.
Landing pages & CRO
Where the click either converts or leaks, built per angle.
SEO
Turning the messages that win in ads into pages that rank for free.
GEO
Being cited inside AI assistants, where research increasingly starts.
Questions
Paid social questions, answered properly
Does paid social work for B2B?
For demand creation and retargeting, yes, and the CPMs are a fraction of LinkedIn's. What it cannot do is target by job title with any accuracy, so it is the wrong instrument when your addressable market is a specific list of companies. The usual sensible split is social for reaching people who have the problem and do not yet know your category exists, LinkedIn for the named accounts, search for the ones already looking.
How much creative do you need from us?
Ideally none, because we produce it — and the volume required is higher than most people expect, since fatigue is the main limiting factor. What we do need from you is access to real proof: product screenshots, actual customer language, genuine numbers we are permitted to use. We will not invent results to put in an ad, so if nothing can be evidenced yet, that shapes what the creative can honestly claim.
Why do the platform's numbers differ from our CRM?
Because the platforms count differently and in their own favour. They credit view-through conversions, use long attribution windows, and have no visibility into whether a lead became an opportunity. Our reporting shows both sets of numbers and the gap between them, because the gap itself is informative — and we optimise against the CRM side, not the platform's.
What budget does this need?
Enough for one platform to accumulate meaningful conversion data within a few weeks, plus the creative production to keep it fed. The media figure depends on your category's CPMs, which we check against live platform data during the audit. The more common failure is not too little media budget but too little creative — a well-funded account with three ads will still stall.
Can you prove the spend was incremental?
Only with a test, which is why we run geo holdouts or scaled-spend tests where the budget supports them. Without a test, anyone claiming certainty about incrementality on a demand-creation channel is guessing confidently. We will tell you what the available evidence does and does not support, and what a test would cost to settle it.
How quickly will we see results?
Retargeting moves almost immediately, because those people already know you. Demand creation does not: it works by making people aware of a category or a problem, and that shows up first as branded search and direct traffic rather than as last-click conversions. We report leading indicators in the meantime and are explicit about which numbers are early signals rather than outcomes.
Do you handle community management or organic posting?
No — we run the paid side. We will tell you when organic presence is the missing piece, because on some platforms, Reddit and TikTok especially, an account with no organic footprint makes the ads work harder than they need to. That is honest advice rather than something we are trying to sell you.
Who owns the ad accounts and the pixels?
You do. Everything is built in your own business accounts under your billing, with us operating as a user. Pixels, server-side tagging, custom audiences, creative files and the reporting build stay with you, and access can be revoked at any point without us holding anything hostage.
Will you tell us to stop spending here?
Yes, when the evidence says so — in the quarterly review, in writing. Paid social is the easiest channel in which to keep a retainer running on engagement metrics that feel like progress. If the incrementality evidence is weak and cost per opportunity is worse than your alternatives, the recommendation will be to move the budget.
How does this connect to the SEO and GEO work?
Through message testing, mainly. Paid social tells you within days which angles, objections and phrasings actually move people — evidence that would take months to gather organically. Those winning angles then become the briefs for the pages we want ranking in search and cited by AI assistants, so the paid budget buys both pipeline and research.
Which platform should we start with?
Whichever one your buyers plausibly use and your product can be understood on in a few seconds — which for most B2B and considered-purchase companies means Meta first, because its optimisation is the most mature and its audience the broadest. The exceptions are real: technical and developer products often do better on Reddit, where the audience self-selects by topic, and anything that demonstrates well in motion is worth testing on TikTok. We pick one, give it enough budget and creative to produce a verdict, and expand only once it has.
Ready when you are
Let’s find your next 30% of growth.
A free audit across SEO, GEO, CRM & automation — no strings, no ‘contact for pricing’.